State Satpur Police stn Nashik vs Akshay Ashok Gavande Advocate - Shejwal Pravin R. — 66/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1), 308(3), 351(2). Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010008492026
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
518/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
FIR Details
FIR Number
487
Police Station
SATPUR POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Satpur Police stn Nashik
Adv. App Sonawane Shailesh H
Respondent(s)
Akshay Ashok Gavande Advocate - Shejwal Pravin R.
Hearing History
Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 25-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 11-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Outcome: Bail Application Rejected The Special (POCSO) Judge, Nashik rejected the bail application of Akshay Ashok Gavande, accused of sexually exploiting a 16-year-old minor victim under POCSO Act sections 4, 8, 12 and BNS sections 64(1), 308(3), 351(2). The court found prima facie evidence of serious allegations including sexual abuse, extortion of ₹12,000 through threats to circulate obscene photographs, and furnishing false documents at lodges, which established the gravity of the case and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Outcome: Bail Application Rejected The Special (POCSO) Judge, Nashik rejected the bail application of Akshay Ashok Gavande, accused of sexually exploiting a 16-year-old minor victim under POCSO Act sections 4, 8, 12 and BNS sections 64(1), 308(3), 351(2). The court found prima facie evidence of serious allegations including sexual abuse, extortion of ₹12,000 through threats to circulate obscene photographs, and furnishing false documents at lodges, which established the gravity of the case and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts