State Wadivarhe police stn Nashik vs Ambarnath Alias Amruta Rakhma Bhale Advocate - Shejwal Pravin R. — 53/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2), 64, 65, 69. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHNS010007132026

Charge

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

415/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

FIR Details

FIR Number

242

Police Station

WADIWARE POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2), 64, 65, 69
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4, 8, 12

Petitioner(s)

State Wadivarhe police stn Nashik

Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.

Respondent(s)

Ambarnath Alias Amruta Rakhma Bhale Advocate - Shejwal Pravin R.

Hearing History

Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

02-04-2026

Charge

12-03-2026

Charge

11-03-2026

Compliance

10-03-2026

Order on Exh

10-03-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Bail Granted – The Special (POCSO) Judge, Nashik allowed the bail application of accused Ambarnath alias Amruta Rakhma Bhale in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual abuse of a minor. The accused was released on personal bond of Rs. 30,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including a restriction from visiting the victim's locality until trial conclusion and undertaking not to tamper with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Bail Granted – The Special (POCSO) Judge, Nashik allowed the bail application of accused Ambarnath alias Amruta Rakhma Bhale in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual abuse of a minor. The accused was released on personal bond of Rs. 30,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including a restriction from visiting the victim's locality until trial conclusion and undertaking not to tamper with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case