Shewantabai Mahadeo Dangar(Legal Heir) vs The Executive Engi. and 1 Advocate - Adv. A. G. Wandile — 168/2016

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHNG190007172025

Filing Number

711/2025

Filing Date

22-Sep-2016

Registration No

168/2016

Registration Date

22-Sep-2016

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shewantabai Mahadeo Dangar(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Adv. D. B. Barsagade1.

  2. 2.Chandrakala Dattu Wanjari

    Adv. Adv. D. B. Barsagade1.

  3. 3.Bebi Shankarrao Belkhade

    Adv. Adv. D. B. Barsagade1.

  4. 4.Sunanda @ Kalpana Jadishrao Shelake

    Adv. Adv. D. B. Barsagade1.

  5. 5.Nirmala Dnyaneshwar Malode

    Adv. Adv. D. B. Barsagade1.

  6. 6.Krushnaji Mahadevrao Dangar

    Adv. Adv. D. B. Barsagade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Executive Engi. and 1 Advocate - Adv. A. G. Wandile

  2. 2.The Collector

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Katol, partially allowed the land acquisition compensation enhancement reference filed by Shewantabai Mahadeo Dangar (deceased) and her legal representatives under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The court enhanced the compensation from Rs. 1,57,900 per hectare to Rs. 2,00,000 per hectare for 0.24 hectares of dry crop land acquired for the Mirzapur Canal No. 1 project, while rejecting the claim for compensation for other trees and dismissing the request for the higher market rate of Rs. 15,00,000 per hectare that was not adequately substantiated with comparable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  12. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  13. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  14. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  15. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  16. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  17. 10-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  18. 17-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  19. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  20. 15-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  21. 08-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  22. 24-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  23. 12-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  24. 16-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  25. 14-Jul-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  26. 06-May-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

  27. 03-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 22-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Katol, partially allowed the land acquisition compensation enhancement reference filed by Shewantabai Mahadeo Dangar (deceased) and her legal representatives under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The court enhanced the compensation from Rs. 1,57,900 per hectare to Rs. 2,00,000 per hectare for 0.24 hectares of dry crop land acquired for the Mirzapur Canal No. 1 project, while rejecting the claim for compensation for other trees and dismissing the request for the higher market rate of Rs. 15,00,000 per hectare that was not adequately substantiated with comparable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case