Vivek Gopikishan Agrawal vs Sushilkumar Narsingdas Agrawal Advocate - Advo. S.V. Deshmukh — 14/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section151. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG190000822026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Katol
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Katol
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vivek Gopikishan Agrawal
Adv. Rohan Madhusudan Agrawal
Respondent(s)
Sushilkumar Narsingdas Agrawal Advocate - Advo. S.V. Deshmukh
Rooplal Atmaram Zade
Mukhtar Mubarakha Pathan
Dashrath Bapuraoji Wange
Sanket Prakash Bamborde
Rupali Hemant Thakare
Mayuri Prabhakar Timane
Priyanka Sanket Bambode
Satyanarayan Ramgopal Agrawal
Kautuk Prabhakar Timane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Katol
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Awaiting Summons
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 13-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-03-2026 | First Order |
| 05-03-2026 | First Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge Senior Division, Katol, heard the plaintiff's counsel and ordered the issuance of a show cause notice to the defendants on why an injunction should not be granted. The case has been adjourned to 13.04.2026 for the defendants' response before any interim relief decision is made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge Senior Division, Katol, heard the plaintiff's counsel and ordered the issuance of a show cause notice to the defendants on why an injunction should not be granted. The case has been adjourned to 13.04.2026 for the defendants' response before any interim relief decision is made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts