State of Maharashtra vs Gangadhar Kisan Dhoke — 379/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180005262026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

485/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

379/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

95

Police Station

Kelwad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gangadhar Kisan Dhoke

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gangadhar Kisan Dhoke (S.S.C. 379/2026) The accused was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) through special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea and paid a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered and transmitted to court. The court sentenced him to the fine already paid, cancelled his bail bonds, and forfeited any cash recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 379/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gangadhar Kisan Dhoke (S.S.C. 379/2026) The accused was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) through special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea and paid a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered and transmitted to court. The court sentenced him to the fine already paid, cancelled his bail bonds, and forfeited any cash recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case