NANKESHWAR MOHANLAL UEKEY vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 25/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG180004522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

414/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. JMFC KALMESHWAR

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

NANKESHWAR MOHANLAL UEKEY

Adv. Nivedita Kailashrao Bhadange

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. JMFC KALMESHWAR

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Reply/Say

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNSS 2023 to recover his seized mobile phone. The court found the applicant established ownership through mobile bills and reasoned that prolonged police custody risked property deterioration without serving investigative purposes. The mobile was released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 20,000 with strict conditions: the applicant cannot sell, modify, or transfer it without court permission, must preserve it, produce it when directed, and cannot use it for gambling activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNSS 2023 to recover his seized mobile phone. The court found the applicant established ownership through mobile bills and reasoned that prolonged police custody risked property deterioration without serving investigative purposes. The mobile was released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 20,000 with strict conditions: the applicant cannot sell, modify, or transfer it without court permission, must preserve it, produce it when directed, and cannot use it for gambling activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case