State of Maharashtra vs Rajkumar Ramdas Barapatre — 310/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180004262026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

389/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

310/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. JMFC KALMESHWAR

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

Kelwad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Rajkumar Ramdas Barapatre

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. JMFC KALMESHWAR

14-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

Lok-Nyayalaya

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajkumar Ramdas Barapatre (S.S.C. No. 310/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Rajkumar Ramdas Barapatre under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) following a special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea and paid a fine of ₹200, which was already recovered by the serving officer and transmitted to the court. The court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any cash, while confirming interim custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajkumar Ramdas Barapatre (S.S.C. No. 310/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Rajkumar Ramdas Barapatre under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) following a special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea and paid a fine of ₹200, which was already recovered by the serving officer and transmitted to the court. The court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any cash, while confirming interim custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case