Laxmibai Natthuji Dhone vs Ashok Maniram Chankapure — 19/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 20 Rule 18. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG180004202026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

36/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 20 Rule 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxmibai Natthuji Dhone

    Adv. GAJBHIYE NILESH ASHOKRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Maniram Chankapure

  2. 2.Pandhari Maniram Chankapure

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed an application for change of address of the defendant. The plaintiff's advocate submitted that although the same address was provided for both parties, the defendant is residing at a different location, making it necessary to update the court records. The application was granted as just and proper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed an application for change of address of the defendant. The plaintiff's advocate submitted that although the same address was provided for both parties, the defendant is residing at a different location, making it necessary to update the court records. The application was granted as just and proper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case