State of Maharashtra vs Mahendra Ramchandra Patil — 297/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180004032026

Filing Number

373/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

297/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

181

Police Station

Kalmeshwar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahendra Ramchandra Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mahendra Ramchandra Patil (297/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Mahendra Ramchandra Patil under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200, which had already been recovered and transmitted to court. The court accepted the accused's plea on special summons issued under Section 229 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and cancelled his bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 297/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mahendra Ramchandra Patil (297/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Mahendra Ramchandra Patil under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200, which had already been recovered and transmitted to court. The court accepted the accused's plea on special summons issued under Section 229 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and cancelled his bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case