State of Maharashtra vs Roshan Keshwrao Kale — 288/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180003932026

Filing Number

364/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

288/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

176

Police Station

Kalmeshwar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshan Keshwrao Kale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 288/2026: State v. Roshan Keshwrao Kale The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Roshan Kale under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) based on his plea accepted under special summons provisions. Kale was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹200, which had already been recovered and transmitted to court by the serving officer. The court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any cash seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 288/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 288/2026: State v. Roshan Keshwrao Kale The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Roshan Kale under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) based on his plea accepted under special summons provisions. Kale was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹200, which had already been recovered and transmitted to court by the serving officer. The court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any cash seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case