State of Maharashtra vs Upendra Rajeshwar Shah — 286/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180003912026

Filing Number

362/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

286/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

174

Police Station

Kalmeshwar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Upendra Rajeshwar Shah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.S.C. No. 286/2026 – State v. Upendra Rajeshwar Shah The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Upendra Shah under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) based on his plea acceptance to a special summons. Shah was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered by the serving officer and transmitted to the court. The court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any cash seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 286/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.S.C. No. 286/2026 – State v. Upendra Rajeshwar Shah The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Upendra Shah under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) based on his plea acceptance to a special summons. Shah was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered by the serving officer and transmitted to the court. The court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any cash seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case