State of Maharashtra vs Bhuvneshwar Ukandarov Anturkar — 271/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180003762026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

347/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

165

Police Station

Saoner

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhuvneshwar Ukandarov Anturkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Bhuvneshwar Ukandarov Anturkar (S.S.C. 271/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Bhuvneshwar Ukandarov Anturkar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered and transmitted to court via special summons procedure. The court accepted the accused's plea, cancelled his bail bonds, and forfeited any seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Bhuvneshwar Ukandarov Anturkar (S.S.C. 271/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Bhuvneshwar Ukandarov Anturkar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered and transmitted to court via special summons procedure. The court accepted the accused's plea, cancelled his bail bonds, and forfeited any seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case