State of Maharashtra vs Shekhar Banduji Marotkar — 261/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180003662026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

337/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

261/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

Saoner

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shekhar Banduji Marotkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Shekhar Banduji Marotkar (261/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Shekhar Banduji Marotkar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered by the police. The court accepted the accused's plea under special summons procedure (Section 229 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after he provided his signature and transmitted the fine amount to the serving officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 261/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Shekhar Banduji Marotkar (261/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Shekhar Banduji Marotkar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, which was already recovered by the police. The court accepted the accused's plea under special summons procedure (Section 229 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after he provided his signature and transmitted the fine amount to the serving officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case