ANITA KRUSHNA SAWADH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 14/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG180003142026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
287/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar
Judge
8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Kalmeshwar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANITA KRUSHNA SAWADH
Adv. Nivedita Kailashrao Bhadange
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed applicant Anita Krushna Sawadh's application and ordered release of seized gold items (10g biscuit, 5g earrings, 3g ring, 1g locket) to her custody until trial conclusion, finding her to be the rightful owner based on bills and affidavit evidence, with no other claimants objecting. The release was conditioned on executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 2,50,000 and restrictions against selling, altering, or misusing the items, with the investigating officer directed to photograph and document the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed applicant Anita Krushna Sawadh's application and ordered release of seized gold items (10g biscuit, 5g earrings, 3g ring, 1g locket) to her custody until trial conclusion, finding her to be the rightful owner based on bills and affidavit evidence, with no other claimants objecting. The release was conditioned on executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 2,50,000 and restrictions against selling, altering, or misusing the items, with the investigating officer directed to photograph and document the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts