State of Maharashtra vs Gajanan Rasmdas Neware — 222/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180003102026

Filing Number

283/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

125

Police Station

Kalmeshwar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gajanan Rasmdas Neware

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Gajanan Rasmdas Neware (222/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Gajanan Neware under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) based on a special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea on special summons, and the fine of Rs. 200 was already collected by the serving officer and transmitted to court. The court sentenced him to pay the fine (already recovered), cancelled bail bonds, and forfeited any cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Gajanan Rasmdas Neware (222/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Gajanan Neware under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) based on a special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea on special summons, and the fine of Rs. 200 was already collected by the serving officer and transmitted to court. The court sentenced him to pay the fine (already recovered), cancelled bail bonds, and forfeited any cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case