State of Maharashtra vs Suraj Shridhar Kogare — 215/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180003032026

Filing Number

276/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

114

Police Station

Kalmeshwar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suraj Shridhar Kogare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Suraj Shridhar Kogare (S.S.C. 215/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Suraj Shridhar Kogare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) through special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea, and a fine of Rs. 200 was imposed, which had already been recovered and transmitted to court. Bail bonds were cancelled, and any forfeited cash was directed to government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Suraj Shridhar Kogare (S.S.C. 215/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Suraj Shridhar Kogare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) through special summons procedure. The accused accepted the plea, and a fine of Rs. 200 was imposed, which had already been recovered and transmitted to court. Bail bonds were cancelled, and any forfeited cash was directed to government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case