State of Maharashtra vs Naim Rafik Shaha — 166/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180002452026

Filing Number

222/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

166/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

92

Police Station

Kalmeshwar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Naim Rafik Shaha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Naim Rafik Shaha (166/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Naim Rafik Shaha under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) and imposed a fine of ₹200, which was already recovered by the police officer under the special summons procedure. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled, and case records ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. JMFC Kalmeshwar

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 166/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Naim Rafik Shaha (166/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted Naim Rafik Shaha under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (via Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) and imposed a fine of ₹200, which was already recovered by the police officer under the special summons procedure. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled, and case records ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case