MANOJ JAGAJIWAN PUROHIT vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 8/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG180002382026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

218/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

790

Police Station

Kalmeshwar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ JAGAJIWAN PUROHIT

    Adv. Nivedita Kailashrao Bhadange

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court granted Manoj Purohit's application for release of his seized Splendor vehicle on supratnama under Section 503 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the prosecution objected citing misuse risks, the court found the applicant to be the registered owner with proper documentation and ruled that prolonged police custody could damage the vehicle. The vehicle was ordered released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 70,000 with strict conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or illegal use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  10. 08-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  11. 02-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  12. 01-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  13. 25-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  14. 23-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  15. 17-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  16. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  17. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  18. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  19. 07-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  20. 06-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  21. 05-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  22. 04-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  23. 02-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  24. 27-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  25. 25-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  26. 24-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  27. 23-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  28. 20-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  29. 18-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  30. 16-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  31. 12-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  32. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted Manoj Purohit's application for release of his seized Splendor vehicle on supratnama under Section 503 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the prosecution objected citing misuse risks, the court found the applicant to be the registered owner with proper documentation and ruled that prolonged police custody could damage the vehicle. The vehicle was ordered released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 70,000 with strict conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or illegal use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case