MANOJ JAGAJIWAN PUROHIT vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 22nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG180002382026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
218/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar
Judge
8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
790
Police Station
Kalmeshwar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOJ JAGAJIWAN PUROHIT
Adv. Nivedita Kailashrao Bhadange
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 20-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 18-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 17-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court granted Manoj Purohit's application for release of his seized Splendor vehicle on supratnama under Section 503 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the prosecution objected citing misuse risks, the court found the applicant to be the registered owner with proper documentation and ruled that prolonged police custody could damage the vehicle. The vehicle was ordered released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 70,000 with strict conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or illegal use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted Manoj Purohit's application for release of his seized Splendor vehicle on supratnama under Section 503 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the prosecution objected citing misuse risks, the court found the applicant to be the registered owner with proper documentation and ruled that prolonged police custody could damage the vehicle. The vehicle was ordered released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 70,000 with strict conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or illegal use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts