State of Maharashtra vs Rahul Lamkshan Korate — 153/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG180002242026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

205/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

153/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kalmeshwar

Judge

8-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

Kelwad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Lamkshan Korate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Rahul Lamkshan Korate (S.S.C. 153/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Rahul Lamkshan Korate under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹200, which was already recovered and transmitted to the court. The accused accepted the plea on special summons issued under Section 229, and the court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 153/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Rahul Lamkshan Korate (S.S.C. 153/2026) The Kalmeshwar Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Rahul Lamkshan Korate under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹200, which was already recovered and transmitted to the court. The accused accepted the plea on special summons issued under Section 229, and the court cancelled his bail bonds and forfeited any seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case