State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Ajay Ganpat Parate — 432/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG170007622024
e-Filing Number
02-12-2024
Filing Number
687/2024
Filing Date
02-12-2024
Registration No
432/2024
Registration Date
02-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
395
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. Adv. V. U. Mirche
Respondent(s)
Ajay Ganpat Parate
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Ajay Ganpat Porate of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite chemical reports confirming illicit liquor in seized bottles. The court ruled that the prosecution could not prove the seizure procedure through credible witness testimony, as the sole witness examined could not corroborate the prosecution's case and other key witnesses failed to appear despite summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court acquitted the accused Ajay Ganpat Porate of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite chemical reports confirming illicit liquor in seized bottles. The court ruled that the prosecution could not prove the seizure procedure through credible witness testimony, as the sole witness examined could not corroborate the prosecution's case and other key witnesses failed to appear despite summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts