State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Anil Surabhi Solanki — 539/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG170007562025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-07-2025
Filing Number
709/2025
Filing Date
19-08-2025
Registration No
539/2025
Registration Date
29-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
432
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. Adv. S. S. More
Respondent(s)
Anil Surabhi Solanki
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal court order (FIR No. 539/2025) in a case against Avil Solanki under Section 6 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (liquor offense). The court recorded testimony from the prosecution's witness (Dasrath Balkrishna Vikure) and the accused's statement. The witness confirmed that ten bottles of country liquor were seized from the accused's possession and a seizure panchnama was prepared. The accused denied the charges and claimed police misconduct. The court admitted the statements and no further cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal court order (FIR No. 539/2025) in a case against Avil Solanki under Section 6 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (liquor offense). The court recorded testimony from the prosecution's witness (Dasrath Balkrishna Vikure) and the accused's statement. The witness confirmed that ten bottles of country liquor were seized from the accused's possession and a seizure panchnama was prepared. The accused denied the charges and claimed police misconduct. The court admitted the statements and no further cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts