State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Abhay Shivram Gondane And Others Advocate - Shri. P. S. Hunge — 86/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),49. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG170006962025
e-Filing Number
18-07-2025
Filing Number
652/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
86/2025
Registration Date
13-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
193
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. Adv. S. S. More
Respondent(s)
Abhay Shivram Gondane And Others Advocate - Shri. P. S. Hunge
Sachin Chandrashekhar Waghmare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 28-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 18-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Bhiwapur Court (Nagpur) acquitted both accused Abhay Shivram Gondane and Sachiin Chandrashekhar Waghmarre of charges under IPC Section 303(2), 49 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act Section 3, finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution's case relied solely on a defective panchnama (seizure document) with witness inconsistencies and failed to prove the accused's ownership or involvement in allegedly transporting sand without permits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The Bhiwapur Court (Nagpur) acquitted both accused Abhay Shivram Gondane and Sachiin Chandrashekhar Waghmarre of charges under IPC Section 303(2), 49 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act Section 3, finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution's case relied solely on a defective panchnama (seizure document) with witness inconsistencies and failed to prove the accused's ownership or involvement in allegedly transporting sand without permits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts