State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Ayush Maroti Thul And Others — 77/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG170006922025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-07-2025

Filing Number

648/2025

Filing Date

04-08-2025

Registration No

77/2025

Registration Date

06-08-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

234

Police Station

Bhiwapur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),352,351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur

Adv. Adv. S. S. More

Respondent(s)

Ayush Maroti Thul And Others

Maroti Ramchandra Thul

Durga Maroti Thul

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

05-05-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

23-01-2026

Evidence

19-12-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Bhiwapur acquitted all three accused persons—Aayush Maroti Thul, Maroti Ramchandra Thul, and Durga Maroti Thul—of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 118(1), 351(2), 351(3), and 352 with section 3(5). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case, as the sole prosecution witness (the complainant Baban Ramchandra Thul) did not support the prosecution's allegations and even admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. Consequently, all accused were acquitted under IPC section 271(1) and released on personal bonds of ₹15,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

23-01-2026
Charge
12-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Bhiwapur acquitted all three accused persons—Aayush Maroti Thul, Maroti Ramchandra Thul, and Durga Maroti Thul—of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 118(1), 351(2), 351(3), and 352 with section 3(5). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case, as the sole prosecution witness (the complainant Baban Ramchandra Thul) did not support the prosecution's allegations and even admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. Consequently, all accused were acquitted under IPC section 271(1) and released on personal bonds of ₹15,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case