State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Sandip Arun Madankar And Others — 106/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,109,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG170006522024
e-Filing Number
21-09-2024
Filing Number
586/2024
Filing Date
04-Oct-2024
Registration No
106/2024
Registration Date
04-Oct-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
231
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. Adv. V. U. Mirche
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sandip Arun Madankar And Others
-
2.Rakesh Rameshji Gedam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary In this criminal case from Bhiwapur, Maharashtra, the court acquitted defendant Rakesh Ramesh Gedam of charges under IPC Sections 379 (theft) and 109 (abetment), along with violations of the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as it relied primarily on the scene panchnama (inspection report) but the two independent witnesses (panchs) present at the site did not testify in support of the prosecution, and no independent eyewitnesses corroborated the allegations of illegal sand theft. Consequently, the defendant was acquitted and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
13-Apr-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
09-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
23-Jan-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
22-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
08-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
ChargeView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
25-Nov-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
17-Oct-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
02-Sep-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
03-Jul-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
27-May-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
04-Apr-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
25-Feb-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
13-Jan-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
29-Nov-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. And J.m.f.c.,bhiwapur
-
04-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 106/2024
Summary In this criminal case from Bhiwapur, Maharashtra, the court acquitted defendant Rakesh Ramesh Gedam of charges under IPC Sections 379 (theft) and 109 (abetment), along with violations of the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as it relied primarily on the scene panchnama (inspection report) but the two independent witnesses (panchs) present at the site did not testify in support of the prosecution, and no independent eyewitnesses corroborated the allegations of illegal sand theft. Consequently, the defendant was acquitted and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts