State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Umesh Dadaji Patil Advocate - Shri. P. L. Nagoshe — 358/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG170005702021
e-Filing Number
25-11-2021
Filing Number
504/2021
Filing Date
16-12-2021
Registration No
358/2021
Registration Date
16-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
295
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. K. G. Kannake, APP
Respondent(s)
Umesh Dadaji Patil Advocate - Shri. P. L. Nagoshe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Bhiwapur acquitted accused Umesh Patiil of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that critical witnesses did not appear despite summons, no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized bottles contained illicit liquor, and the seizure panchanama (official record) could not be established through independent witnesses, creating reasonable doubt about the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Bhiwapur acquitted accused Umesh Patiil of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that critical witnesses did not appear despite summons, no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized bottles contained illicit liquor, and the seizure panchanama (official record) could not be established through independent witnesses, creating reasonable doubt about the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts