State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Prashant Baburao Meshram Advocate - Shri. P. S. Hunge — 47/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG170004122023
e-Filing Number
12-07-2023
Filing Number
371/2023
Filing Date
12-07-2023
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
12-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
222
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. K. G. Kannake, APP
Respondent(s)
Prashant Baburao Meshram Advocate - Shri. P. S. Hunge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 12-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Case No. 47/2023, the First Class Magistrate of Bhiwapur acquitted accused Prashant Baburao Meshram of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft of minor minerals/sand). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key evidence (scene panchnama) was not corroborated by independent witnesses and relied primarily on police officials' testimonies. The court held that the critical panchas (witnesses) did not cooperate with the prosecution, making the evidence insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Case No. 47/2023, the First Class Magistrate of Bhiwapur acquitted accused Prashant Baburao Meshram of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft of minor minerals/sand). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key evidence (scene panchnama) was not corroborated by independent witnesses and relied primarily on police officials' testimonies. The court held that the critical panchas (witnesses) did not cooperate with the prosecution, making the evidence insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts