State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Gajanan Madhukar Warjurkar — 258/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG170004042023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-07-2023

Filing Number

363/2023

Filing Date

10-07-2023

Registration No

258/2023

Registration Date

10-07-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

206

Police Station

Bhiwapur

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur

Adv. K. G. Kannake, APP

Respondent(s)

Gajanan Madhukar Warjurkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Arguments

20-02-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused Gajanan Madhukar Varjurkar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 15 bottles of country liquor (180 ml each) on 13.05.2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt as the key witness provided no cooperation, other witnesses were not produced despite summons, and the seizure panchnama could not be established, creating doubt about the seized bottles' authenticity despite chemical analysis confirming the presence of alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Gajanan Madhukar Varjurkar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 15 bottles of country liquor (180 ml each) on 13.05.2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt as the key witness provided no cooperation, other witnesses were not produced despite summons, and the seizure panchnama could not be established, creating doubt about the seized bottles' authenticity despite chemical analysis confirming the presence of alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case