State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Gajanan Madhukar Warjurkar — 258/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG170004042023
e-Filing Number
07-07-2023
Filing Number
363/2023
Filing Date
10-07-2023
Registration No
258/2023
Registration Date
10-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
206
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. K. G. Kannake, APP
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Madhukar Warjurkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Gajanan Madhukar Varjurkar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 15 bottles of country liquor (180 ml each) on 13.05.2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt as the key witness provided no cooperation, other witnesses were not produced despite summons, and the seizure panchnama could not be established, creating doubt about the seized bottles' authenticity despite chemical analysis confirming the presence of alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted the accused Gajanan Madhukar Varjurkar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 15 bottles of country liquor (180 ml each) on 13.05.2023. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt as the key witness provided no cooperation, other witnesses were not produced despite summons, and the seizure panchnama could not be established, creating doubt about the seized bottles' authenticity despite chemical analysis confirming the presence of alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts