State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Darshan Devendra Deshmukh And Others — 31/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 239,177,303(2),49,3(5). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG170002722025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2025

Filing Number

251/2025

Filing Date

08-04-2025

Registration No

31/2025

Registration Date

15-05-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

Bhiwapur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 239,177,303(2),49,3(5)
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code Section 48(7),48(8)
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act Section 4,21
Environment (Protection) Act Section 15

Petitioner(s)

State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur

Adv. Adv. S. S. More

Respondent(s)

Darshan Devendra Deshmukh And Others

Akash Madhav Panchabhai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

02-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

06-11-2025
Charge
05-03-2026
Evidence
05-03-2026
Evidence
16-04-2026
Evidence
16-04-2026
Evidence

The court has accepted the accused's defense statement, finding the prosecution's claims unproven. The accused denied the charges that a truck was intercepted and sand was seized in his presence, and disputed the credibility of the witness testimony. The court proceeded to close the cross-examination and counter-examination, with no further re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court has accepted the accused's defense statement, finding the prosecution's claims unproven. The accused denied the charges that a truck was intercepted and sand was seized in his presence, and disputed the credibility of the witness testimony. The court proceeded to close the cross-examination and counter-examination, with no further re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case