State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Jamir Araktulla Sheikh and others Advocate - Shri. P. L. Nagoshe — 110/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 4,12(A). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG170001502020
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
134/2020
Filing Date
20-02-2020
Registration No
110/2020
Registration Date
20-02-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
515
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. V. W. Wankhade
Respondent(s)
Jamir Araktulla Sheikh and others Advocate - Shri. P. L. Nagoshe
Ashish Prakash Chhatrey
Adv. Shri. P. L. Nagoshe
Someshar Deorao Marbade
Adv. Shri. P. L. Nagoshe
Mayur Banduji Shegaonkar
Adv. Shri. P. L. Nagoshe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: FIR No. 110/2020, Bhivapur Police Station, Nagpur (Online Gaming/Gambling case) Outcome: The petition is dismissed with no relief granted. The accused's plea challenging the investigation procedure, seizure of electronic devices, and witness credibility was rejected, with the court finding the police investigation proper and all seized materials valid under Section 23 and subsequent sections of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: FIR No. 110/2020, Bhivapur Police Station, Nagpur (Online Gaming/Gambling case) Outcome: The petition is dismissed with no relief granted. The accused's plea challenging the investigation procedure, seizure of electronic devices, and witness credibility was rejected, with the court finding the police investigation proper and all seized materials valid under Section 23 and subsequent sections of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts