State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Lakhan Balaknath Masram Advocate - Shri. P. L. Nagoshe — 92/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG170001462022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
14-03-2022
Filing Number
131/2022
Filing Date
14-03-2022
Registration No
92/2022
Registration Date
14-03-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. K. G. Kannake, APP
Respondent(s)
Lakhan Balaknath Masram Advocate - Shri. P. L. Nagoshe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary In case FIR 92/2022 (Government vs. Lakhan), the court heard witness testimony on 17.04.2026. The witness (Suresh Yuraj Kamdi) testified that he was not present during the alleged incident and had no knowledge of how it occurred. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was allowed and completed. The court accepted the witness's statement and rejected the accused's counter-arguments. No further examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary In case FIR 92/2022 (Government vs. Lakhan), the court heard witness testimony on 17.04.2026. The witness (Suresh Yuraj Kamdi) testified that he was not present during the alleged incident and had no knowledge of how it occurred. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was allowed and completed. The court accepted the witness's statement and rejected the accused's counter-arguments. No further examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts