Sopan Pandharinath Dadwe vs Kusum Babanrao Dange Advocate - Shri. S. G. Khanorkar — 1800001/2008
Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG170000021991
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1800001/2008
Filing Date
13-02-1991
Registration No
1800001/2008
Registration Date
11-06-2008
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Petitioner(s)
Sopan Pandharinath Dadwe
Adv. Adv .S.K. Likhite
Respondent(s)
Kusum Babanrao Dange Advocate - Shri. S. G. Khanorkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 08-04-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 06-04-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 24-03-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: In RCS No. 01/2008 (Sopan vs. Kusum), the court ordered that further proceedings be stayed under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, pending the final decision in Second Appeal No. 102/2005 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The court found it just and proper to stay proceedings to avoid conflicting decisions, as the suit involved substantially the same issues as the earlier Regular Civil Suit No. 05/1991. Parties were directed to intimate the court after the appellate decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In RCS No. 01/2008 (Sopan vs. Kusum), the court ordered that further proceedings be stayed under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, pending the final decision in Second Appeal No. 102/2005 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The court found it just and proper to stay proceedings to avoid conflicting decisions, as the suit involved substantially the same issues as the earlier Regular Civil Suit No. 05/1991. Parties were directed to intimate the court after the appellate decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts