Kolba Kothiram Yerne.(Legal Heir) vs Smt. Sakuntalabai Jagannath Yerne. — 31/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG160013012019
Filing Number
50/2019
Filing Date
07-Sep-2019
Registration No
31/2019
Registration Date
07-Sep-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
6-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kolba Kothiram Yerne.(Legal Heir)
Adv. Adv. P.B. Yadav1.
-
2.Sughandhabai Kolbaji Yerne 1.
-
3.Vasanta Kolbaji Yerne 1.
-
4.Sapna Mangesh Yerne 1.
-
5.Rahul Kolbaji Yerne
-
6.Gdangadhar S/o Kothiram Yerne
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. Sakuntalabai Jagannath Yerne.
-
2.Balkrishna S/o Jagannath Yerne
-
3.Sanjay S/o Jagannath Yerne.
-
4.Pravin Jagannath Yerne.
-
5.Pundlik S/o Ganpat Ambilduke.
-
6.Bayabai alias Birjabai Wd/o Baiyyaji Hajare.
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
Amended Plaint
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
04-Apr-2026
Amended Plaint
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
04-Apr-2026
Amended Plaint
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
12-Mar-2026
Amended Plaint
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
27-Feb-2026
Amended Plaint
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
13-Feb-2026
Amended Plaint
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
23-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
02-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
13-Dec-2024
Compliance
-
08-Nov-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the applications filed by the legal heirs of deceased plaintiff No.1 (who died on 31.10.2023). The court condoned the delay in filing the application and set aside the abatement order, permitting the legal heirs (widow and children) to be brought on record as parties to the suit concerning the ownership of property S.No.29 (0.58 HR). The court found that the cause of action survived to the applicants and they were necessary parties for an effective decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Nov-2024
Compliance
-
04-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
-
06-Sep-2024
Reply/Say
-
19-Jul-2024
Reply/Say
-
14-Jun-2024
Reply/Say
-
21-Mar-2024
Steps
-
17-Feb-2024
Evidence
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
-
21-Nov-2023
Evidence
-
25-Sep-2023
Evidence
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence
-
15-Jun-2023
Evidence
-
26-Apr-2023
Evidence
-
28-Mar-2023
Steps
-
21-Feb-2023
Steps
-
27-Jan-2023
Steps
-
09-Dec-2022
Steps
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence
-
16-Sep-2022
Evidence
-
12-Aug-2022
Evidence
-
24-Jun-2022
Evidence
-
22-Apr-2022
Evidence
-
25-Mar-2022
Evidence
-
04-Mar-2022
Evidence
-
11-Feb-2022
Evidence
-
21-Jan-2022
Evidence
-
07-Jan-2022
Evidence
-
06-Dec-2021
Evidence
-
10-Nov-2021
Evidence
-
01-Oct-2021
Appearance
-
03-Sep-2021
Summons_Ready
-
30-Jul-2021
Steps
-
25-Jun-2021
Steps
-
23-Apr-2021
Steps
-
19-Mar-2021
Steps
-
05-Feb-2021
Steps
-
18-Dec-2020
Steps
-
06-Nov-2020
Steps
-
18-Sep-2020
Steps
-
07-Aug-2020
Steps
-
12-Jun-2020
Steps
-
27-Mar-2020
Steps
-
14-Feb-2020
Steps
-
24-Jan-2020
Steps
-
20-Dec-2019
Steps
-
15-Nov-2019
Steps
-
04-Oct-2019
Steps
-
07-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Sep-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2019
Summary: The court allowed the applications filed by the legal heirs of deceased plaintiff No.1 (who died on 31.10.2023). The court condoned the delay in filing the application and set aside the abatement order, permitting the legal heirs (widow and children) to be brought on record as parties to the suit concerning the ownership of property S.No.29 (0.58 HR). The court found that the cause of action survived to the applicants and they were necessary parties for an effective decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts