State of Maharashtra vs Babi uraf Ajuba Lahanu Patre — 135/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),126(2),3(5). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 27-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG160010302025

e-Filing Number

11-07-2025

Filing Number

969/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

135/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

261

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),126(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. B.M. Bhagat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Babi uraf Ajuba Lahanu Patre

  2. 2.Vinod Ruprao Ghodmare

  3. 3.Krishna Vishwanath Londhe

  4. 4.Aman Ramu Patre

  5. 5.Sanjay Ranjit Dighapate

    Adv. M.M. Tawar

  6. 6.Rakesh Gangadhar Gupta

    Adv. M.M. Tawar

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary Petition Allowed. The court granted the petitioner's application for return of seized gold jewelry (30 grams gold bracelet and 15 grams gold chain) on the basis that the First Information Report describes the stolen items as a bracelet and chain, not gold ornaments, creating discrepancy in descriptions. The petitioner is ordered to execute an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 1,50,000 with specified conditions, and the seized jewelry shall be returned upon fulfillment of these conditions pending final judgment in Criminal Case No. 261/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  11. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  14. 07-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  15. 29-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  16. 14-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  17. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  18. 03-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  19. 01-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  20. 07-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  21. 15-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 135/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Petition Allowed. The court granted the petitioner's application for return of seized gold jewelry (30 grams gold bracelet and 15 grams gold chain) on the basis that the First Information Report describes the stolen items as a bracelet and chain, not gold ornaments, creating discrepancy in descriptions. The petitioner is ordered to execute an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 1,50,000 with specified conditions, and the seized jewelry shall be returned upon fulfillment of these conditions pending final judgment in Criminal Case No. 261/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case