State of Maharashtra vs Babi uraf Ajuba Lahanu Patre — 135/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),126(2),3(5). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG160010302025

Appearance

Next Hearing

27th July 2026

e-Filing Number

11-07-2025

Filing Number

969/2025

Filing Date

15-07-2025

Registration No

135/2025

Registration Date

15-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

FIR Details

FIR Number

261

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),126(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. B.M. Bhagat

Respondent(s)

Babi uraf Ajuba Lahanu Patre

Vinod Ruprao Ghodmare

Krishna Vishwanath Londhe

Aman Ramu Patre

Sanjay Ranjit Dighapate

Adv. M.M. Tawar

Rakesh Gangadhar Gupta

Adv. M.M. Tawar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

04-05-2026

Appearance

17-03-2026

Appearance

16-03-2026

Appearance

12-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary Petition Allowed. The court granted the petitioner's application for return of seized gold jewelry (30 grams gold bracelet and 15 grams gold chain) on the basis that the First Information Report describes the stolen items as a bracelet and chain, not gold ornaments, creating discrepancy in descriptions. The petitioner is ordered to execute an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 1,50,000 with specified conditions, and the seized jewelry shall be returned upon fulfillment of these conditions pending final judgment in Criminal Case No. 261/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Petition Allowed. The court granted the petitioner's application for return of seized gold jewelry (30 grams gold bracelet and 15 grams gold chain) on the basis that the First Information Report describes the stolen items as a bracelet and chain, not gold ornaments, creating discrepancy in descriptions. The petitioner is ordered to execute an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 1,50,000 with specified conditions, and the seized jewelry shall be returned upon fulfillment of these conditions pending final judgment in Criminal Case No. 261/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case