State of Maharashtra vs Babi uraf Ajuba Lahanu Patre — 135/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),126(2),3(5). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG160010302025
Next Hearing
27th July 2026
e-Filing Number
11-07-2025
Filing Number
969/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
135/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
FIR Details
FIR Number
261
Police Station
Mouda
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. B.M. Bhagat
Respondent(s)
Babi uraf Ajuba Lahanu Patre
Vinod Ruprao Ghodmare
Krishna Vishwanath Londhe
Aman Ramu Patre
Sanjay Ranjit Dighapate
Adv. M.M. Tawar
Rakesh Gangadhar Gupta
Adv. M.M. Tawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Appearance |
| 17-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Summary Petition Allowed. The court granted the petitioner's application for return of seized gold jewelry (30 grams gold bracelet and 15 grams gold chain) on the basis that the First Information Report describes the stolen items as a bracelet and chain, not gold ornaments, creating discrepancy in descriptions. The petitioner is ordered to execute an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 1,50,000 with specified conditions, and the seized jewelry shall be returned upon fulfillment of these conditions pending final judgment in Criminal Case No. 261/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Petition Allowed. The court granted the petitioner's application for return of seized gold jewelry (30 grams gold bracelet and 15 grams gold chain) on the basis that the First Information Report describes the stolen items as a bracelet and chain, not gold ornaments, creating discrepancy in descriptions. The petitioner is ordered to execute an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 1,50,000 with specified conditions, and the seized jewelry shall be returned upon fulfillment of these conditions pending final judgment in Criminal Case No. 261/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts