State of Maharashtra vs Ramdas Shalikram Karkade and 1 Advocate - M.H. Rahangdale — 551/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,323,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG160010042017
Filing Number
952/2017
Filing Date
23-Nov-2017
Registration No
551/2017
Registration Date
23-Nov-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
138
Police Station
Aroli
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramdas Shalikram Karkade and 1 Advocate - M.H. Rahangdale
-
2.Sadashiv Puranlal Mule
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mouda acquitted accused Ramdas Shalikram Karkade of charges under IPC Sections 448 (criminal trespass) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) r/w Section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant provided inconsistent testimony regarding the incident's timing (5:30 AM vs. 6:00 PM), lacked knowledge of her own FIR contents, and did not specify which accused assaulted her; additionally, no documentary proof established the complainant's land possession, and the spot panchnama witness had no personal knowledge of its contents. The second accused's case was abated due to his death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
09-Feb-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
10-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
25-Aug-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
14-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence
-
29-Aug-2024
Order
-
26-Jun-2024
Order
-
07-May-2024
Order
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence
-
17-Jan-2024
Evidence
-
23-Oct-2023
Evidence
-
02-Aug-2023
Evidence
-
17-Jun-2023
Evidence
-
27-Apr-2023
Evidence
-
10-Mar-2023
Evidence
-
13-Feb-2023
Evidence
-
06-Dec-2022
Evidence
-
10-Oct-2022
Evidence
-
17-Aug-2022
Evidence
-
15-Jul-2022
Evidence
-
07-Jun-2022
Evidence
-
13-Apr-2022
Evidence
-
23-Mar-2022
Evidence
-
02-Feb-2022
Evidence
-
14-Dec-2021
Evidence
-
13-Oct-2021
Evidence
-
17-Aug-2021
Evidence
-
17-May-2021
Evidence
-
25-Mar-2021
Evidence
-
05-Mar-2021
Plea / Particulars
-
04-Mar-2021
N.B.W._Ready
-
06-Feb-2021
N.B.W._Ready
-
06-Nov-2020
Evidence
-
06-Aug-2020
Evidence
-
06-Jun-2020
Evidence
-
07-Apr-2020
Evidence
-
24-Feb-2020
Evidence
-
07-Jan-2020
PleaView PDF
-
07-Jan-2020
Evidence
-
26-Nov-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
26-Sep-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
04-Jul-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
16-Apr-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
22-Feb-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
19-Nov-2018
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
27-Aug-2018
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
28-May-2018
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
04-Apr-2018
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
20-Feb-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Nov-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 551/2017
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mouda acquitted accused Ramdas Shalikram Karkade of charges under IPC Sections 448 (criminal trespass) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) r/w Section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant provided inconsistent testimony regarding the incident's timing (5:30 AM vs. 6:00 PM), lacked knowledge of her own FIR contents, and did not specify which accused assaulted her; additionally, no documentary proof established the complainant's land possession, and the spot panchnama witness had no personal knowledge of its contents. The second accused's case was abated due to his death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts