State Maharashtra vs Ashok Bajirao Ukunde Advocate - Sou. Minal M. Tawar — 504/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG160007392025

Filing Number

696/2025

Filing Date

08-May-2025

Registration No

504/2025

Registration Date

08-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

310

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Bajirao Ukunde Advocate - Sou. Minal M. Tawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Moidà Police Court rejected the petitioner's (State Maharashtra) application challenging the grant of bail to respondent Ashok Bajirao Ukunde under the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found sufficient grounds to grant bail and imposed a bond of ₹10,000 with seven days' notice to the accused, determining that the evidence against the accused was not conclusive enough to warrant continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  4. 20-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  5. 04-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  6. 10-May-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  7. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 504/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Moidà Police Court rejected the petitioner's (State Maharashtra) application challenging the grant of bail to respondent Ashok Bajirao Ukunde under the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found sufficient grounds to grant bail and imposed a bond of ₹10,000 with seven days' notice to the accused, determining that the evidence against the accused was not conclusive enough to warrant continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case