State Maharashtra vs Tejas Vijay Dhawale — 498/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG160007332025

Filing Number

690/2025

Filing Date

08-May-2025

Registration No

498/2025

Registration Date

08-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

219

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tejas Vijay Dhawale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Tejas Vijay Dhawale under Section 185 of the Indian Penal Code for rash and negligent driving of a motor vehicle (registration MH 40 BV 2110). The court found the accused guilty based on evidence that he drove under the influence of alcohol between 14:55-15:30 hours and imposed a fine of ₹10,000 with seven days imprisonment as an alternative to the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  5. 09-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  6. 10-May-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  7. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 498/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Tejas Vijay Dhawale under Section 185 of the Indian Penal Code for rash and negligent driving of a motor vehicle (registration MH 40 BV 2110). The court found the accused guilty based on evidence that he drove under the influence of alcohol between 14:55-15:30 hours and imposed a fine of ₹10,000 with seven days imprisonment as an alternative to the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case