State of Maharashtra vs Naim Beg Ismile Beg Advocate - A. S. Rewatkar — 85/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,109,34. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG160006552024
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
22-04-2024
Filing Number
606/2024
Filing Date
23-04-2024
Registration No
85/2024
Registration Date
23-04-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
FIR Details
FIR Number
228
Police Station
Mouda
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Naim Beg Ismile Beg Advocate - A. S. Rewatkar
Mohammad Tanvir Sheikh Salim
Adv. R.U. Dhone
Wasim Khan Male Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 20-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 20-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 08-04-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The application under Section 457 CrPC for interim custody of a seized Realme C55 mobile phone was allowed. The applicant, Mohammad Tanweer Shaikh Saleem, was granted custody of the mobile upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, transfer, or dispose of it until trial conclusion and must produce it as directed by the court. The investigating officer was directed to prepare a detailed panchnama and photograph of the mobile before handing it over. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The application under Section 457 CrPC for interim custody of a seized Realme C55 mobile phone was allowed. The applicant, Mohammad Tanweer Shaikh Saleem, was granted custody of the mobile upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, transfer, or dispose of it until trial conclusion and must produce it as directed by the court. The investigating officer was directed to prepare a detailed panchnama and photograph of the mobile before handing it over. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts