State of Maharashtra vs Naim Beg Ismile Beg Advocate - A. S. Rewatkar — 85/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,109,34. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG160006552024

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2024

Filing Number

606/2024

Filing Date

23-04-2024

Registration No

85/2024

Registration Date

23-04-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

FIR Details

FIR Number

228

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,109,34
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code Section 48(7),48(8)
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Naim Beg Ismile Beg Advocate - A. S. Rewatkar

Mohammad Tanvir Sheikh Salim

Adv. R.U. Dhone

Wasim Khan Male Khan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

12-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

20-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

20-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

10-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

08-04-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

08-05-2024
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: The application under Section 457 CrPC for interim custody of a seized Realme C55 mobile phone was allowed. The applicant, Mohammad Tanweer Shaikh Saleem, was granted custody of the mobile upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, transfer, or dispose of it until trial conclusion and must produce it as directed by the court. The investigating officer was directed to prepare a detailed panchnama and photograph of the mobile before handing it over. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The application under Section 457 CrPC for interim custody of a seized Realme C55 mobile phone was allowed. The applicant, Mohammad Tanweer Shaikh Saleem, was granted custody of the mobile upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, transfer, or dispose of it until trial conclusion and must produce it as directed by the court. The investigating officer was directed to prepare a detailed panchnama and photograph of the mobile before handing it over. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case