State Maharashtra vs Mangesh Shriramji Vaidy — 297/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG160004582025
Filing Number
431/2025
Filing Date
20-Mar-2025
Registration No
297/2025
Registration Date
20-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
172
Police Station
Mouda
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Maharashtra
Adv. B.M. Bhagat
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mangesh Shriramji Vaidy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court upheld charges against Mangesh Shriramji Vaidy under the Indian Penal Code Section 185 (driving under influence) for operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content exceeding the legal limit on 10.03.2025. The accused's defense that he received proper information and conducted himself properly was rejected as insufficient. The court imposed a fine of ₹10,000 or seven days imprisonment, finding the evidence against the accused reliable and conviction warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
21-Feb-2026
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
15-Dec-2025
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
09-Sep-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
10-May-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
22-Mar-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
20-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 297/2025
The court upheld charges against Mangesh Shriramji Vaidy under the Indian Penal Code Section 185 (driving under influence) for operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content exceeding the legal limit on 10.03.2025. The accused's defense that he received proper information and conducted himself properly was rejected as insufficient. The court imposed a fine of ₹10,000 or seven days imprisonment, finding the evidence against the accused reliable and conviction warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts