Sukhram S/o Vithobaji Hatwar vs Smt.Barjabai Vitthal Hajare Advocate - S.A. Deole — 9/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG160004282019

Filing Number

19/2019

Filing Date

29-Mar-2019

Registration No

9/2019

Registration Date

29-Mar-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sukhram S/o Vithobaji Hatwar

    Adv. A.G.Mahajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt.Barjabai Vitthal Hajare Advocate - S.A. Deole

  2. 2.Maroti Vitthal Hajare

  3. 3.Hari Vitthal Hajare

  4. 4.Muktabai Manikrao Akre

  5. 5.Shankar Wadudeo Ambilduke

  6. 6.Ku.Ziblabai Wasudeo Ambilduke

  7. 7.Jainabai Wasudeo Ambilduke

  8. 8.Hansaram Shankarji Ambilduke

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  6. 12-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  7. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  8. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  9. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  10. 07-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  11. 07-Feb-2025

    Hearing

  12. 13-Dec-2024

    Hearing

  13. 08-Nov-2024

    Hearing

  14. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing

  15. 30-Aug-2024

    Steps

  16. 09-Aug-2024

    Amended Plaint

  17. 12-Jul-2024

    Amended Plaint

  18. 21-Jun-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 9/2019 (Sukharm v. Barjabai) The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed on 21.06.2024. The court permitted the plaintiff to correct a typographical error in the description of the suit property area—changing it from 0.10 decimal (0.04 HR) to the correct 507.50 sq.ft. (1.55 HR) of land purchased from defendants. The court found the amendment necessary for proper determination of the dispute and caused no prejudice to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 21-Jun-2024

    Compliance

  20. 12-Apr-2024

    Reply/Say

  21. 15-Mar-2024

    Reply/Say

  22. 16-Feb-2024

    Reply/Say

  23. 12-Jan-2024

    Reply/Say

  24. 24-Nov-2023

    Steps

  25. 13-Oct-2023

    Steps

  26. 15-Sep-2023

    Steps

  27. 25-Aug-2023

    Steps

  28. 21-Jul-2023

    Steps

  29. 23-Jun-2023

    Steps

  30. 28-Apr-2023

    Steps

  31. 17-Mar-2023

    Steps

  32. 11-Feb-2023

    Steps

  33. 13-Jan-2023

    Lok-Nyayalaya

  34. 06-Jan-2023

    Steps

  35. 16-Dec-2022

    Steps

  36. 11-Nov-2022

    Order

  37. 04-Nov-2022

    Order

  38. 07-Oct-2022

    Order

  39. 16-Sep-2022

    Order

  40. 12-Aug-2022

    Order

  41. 24-Jun-2022

    Order

  42. 22-Apr-2022

    Order

  43. 25-Feb-2022

    Order

  44. 31-Jan-2022

    Order

  45. 17-Jan-2022

    Order

  46. 03-Jan-2022

    Order

  47. 24-Dec-2021

    Order

  48. 29-Oct-2021

    Order

  49. 24-Sep-2021

    Order

  50. 20-Aug-2021

    Order

  51. 30-Jul-2021

    Order

  52. 09-Jul-2021

    Order

  53. 07-May-2021

    Order

  54. 23-Apr-2021

    Order

  55. 12-Feb-2021

    Order

  56. 18-Dec-2020

    Order

  57. 06-Nov-2020

    Order

  58. 25-Sep-2020

    Order

  59. 21-Aug-2020

    Order

  60. 10-Jul-2020

    Order

  61. 12-Jun-2020

    Order

  62. 03-Apr-2020

    Order

  63. 20-Mar-2020

    Order

  64. 06-Mar-2020

    Order

  65. 07-Feb-2020

    Order

  66. 10-Jan-2020

    Order

  67. 20-Dec-2019

    Compromise

  68. 13-Dec-2019

    Amended Plaint

  69. 29-Nov-2019

    Amended Plaint

  70. 15-Nov-2019

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  71. 15-Nov-2019

    Amended Plaint

  72. 11-Oct-2019

    Steps

  73. 27-Sep-2019

    Steps

  74. 23-Aug-2019

    Awaiting Summons

  75. 02-Aug-2019

    Awaiting Summons

  76. 12-Jul-2019

    Awaiting Summons

  77. 07-Jun-2019

    Awaiting Summons

  78. 26-Apr-2019

    Awaiting Summons

  79. 29-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 29-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 9/2019 (Sukharm v. Barjabai) The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed on 21.06.2024. The court permitted the plaintiff to correct a typographical error in the description of the suit property area—changing it from 0.10 decimal (0.04 HR) to the correct 507.50 sq.ft. (1.55 HR) of land purchased from defendants. The court found the amendment necessary for proper determination of the dispute and caused no prejudice to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case