State Maharashtra vs Laxman Patiram Raghorte Advocate - A. S. Rewatkar — 57/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,504. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 03-Aug-2026

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG160003522019

Filing Number

336/2019

Filing Date

12-Mar-2019

Registration No

57/2019

Registration Date

12-Mar-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

693

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 326,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Maharashtra

    Adv. app

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Patiram Raghorte Advocate - A. S. Rewatkar

Case History

  1. 03-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  8. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  9. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  10. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

  11. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  12. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  13. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  14. 24-Jun-2024

    Order

  15. 04-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  16. 06-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  17. 08-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  18. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  19. 20-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  20. 18-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  21. 24-May-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  22. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  23. 21-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  24. 09-Jan-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  25. 02-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

  26. 29-Sep-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

  27. 10-Aug-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

  28. 29-Jun-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

  29. 05-May-2022

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: The court dismissed the accused Lakman's appeal against allegations of causing injury to the complainant's wife during a dispute in Gowari village, Mohol taluka, Nagpur district. The accused's arguments denying the charges were rejected as the evidence corroborated the complainant's version of events. The case proceeded on merits with no grounds for the appeal being upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  30. 05-May-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

  31. 15-Mar-2022

    Evidence

  32. 20-Jan-2022

    Evidence

  33. 29-Nov-2021

    Evidence

  34. 29-Sep-2021

    Evidence

  35. 06-Aug-2021

    Evidence

  36. 06-May-2021

    Evidence

  37. 09-Mar-2021

    EvidenceView PDF

  38. 09-Mar-2021

    Evidence

  39. 21-Jan-2021

    Evidence

  40. 21-Nov-2020

    Evidence

  41. 21-Oct-2020

    Evidence

  42. 21-Aug-2020

    Evidence

  43. 21-Jul-2020

    Evidence

  44. 21-May-2020

    Evidence

  45. 21-Apr-2020

    Evidence

  46. 07-Mar-2020

    ChargeView PDF

  47. 07-Mar-2020

    Evidence

  48. 22-Jan-2020

    Evidence

  49. 11-Dec-2019

    Evidence

  50. 04-Oct-2019

    ChargeView PDF

  51. 04-Oct-2019

    Evidence

  52. 01-Aug-2019

    Appearance

  53. 23-May-2019

    Appearance

  54. 12-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 12-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the accused Lakman's appeal against allegations of causing injury to the complainant's wife during a dispute in Gowari village, Mohol taluka, Nagpur district. The accused's arguments denying the charges were rejected as the evidence corroborated the complainant's version of events. The case proceeded on merits with no grounds for the appeal being upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case