State Maharashtra vs Nageshwar Ramlu Kothapalli And — 225/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG160003272026

Filing Number

300/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

225/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

6-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

133

Police Station

Aroli

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Maharashtra

    Adv. B.M. Bhagat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nageshwar Ramlu Kothapalli And

  2. 2.Gajanan Santosh Baghamare

  3. 3.Rajesh uraf Raju Ramdas Kodape

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 225/2026 Summary The court convicted all three accused—Nageshwarrao Ramlu Kotapalli, Gajanna Santosh Baghamare, and Rajesh Raju Ramdas Kodape—under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for unauthorized collection of money from a gambling game on 27.02.2026. Each was sentenced to simple imprisonment until rising of court and fined Rs.300, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 225/2026 Summary The court convicted all three accused—Nageshwarrao Ramlu Kotapalli, Gajanna Santosh Baghamare, and Rajesh Raju Ramdas Kodape—under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for unauthorized collection of money from a gambling game on 27.02.2026. Each was sentenced to simple imprisonment until rising of court and fined Rs.300, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case