State Maharashtra vs Imran Nijamkhan Pathan and — 224/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG160003262026

Filing Number

299/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

224/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

6-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

131

Police Station

Aroli

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Maharashtra

    Adv. B.M. Bhagat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Imran Nijamkhan Pathan and

  2. 2.Sandip Sudam Nanhe

  3. 3.Anil Manohar Jumade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court convicted all three accused—Imran Nijamkhan Pathan, Sandip Sudam Nanhe, and Anil Manohar Jumad—under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for unauthorizedly collecting money from a gambling game on 25.02.2026. Each accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. Seized cash of Rs. 1,060 was credited to the government and playing cards ordered destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted all three accused—Imran Nijamkhan Pathan, Sandip Sudam Nanhe, and Anil Manohar Jumad—under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for unauthorizedly collecting money from a gambling game on 25.02.2026. Each accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. Seized cash of Rs. 1,060 was credited to the government and playing cards ordered destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case