State Maharashtra vs Imran Nijamkhan Pathan and — 224/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG160003262026

Case disposed

Filing Number

299/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

224/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

6-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C., Mouda

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

131

Police Station

Aroli

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

State Maharashtra

Adv. B.M. Bhagat

Respondent(s)

Imran Nijamkhan Pathan and

Sandip Sudam Nanhe

Anil Manohar Jumade

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C., Mouda

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court convicted all three accused—Imran Nijamkhan Pathan, Sandip Sudam Nanhe, and Anil Manohar Jumad—under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for unauthorizedly collecting money from a gambling game on 25.02.2026. Each accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. Seized cash of Rs. 1,060 was credited to the government and playing cards ordered destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted all three accused—Imran Nijamkhan Pathan, Sandip Sudam Nanhe, and Anil Manohar Jumad—under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for unauthorizedly collecting money from a gambling game on 25.02.2026. Each accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. Seized cash of Rs. 1,060 was credited to the government and playing cards ordered destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case