Sameer Ahmad Shakil Ahmad Through Power of attorney holder Mishakant Alaam Mohmmad Maksud vs State of Maharastra Through Police Station Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat — 27/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG160003172026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

290/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

165

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Sameer Ahmad Shakil Ahmad Through Power of attorney holder Mishakant Alaam Mohmmad Maksud

Adv. SANGADIKAR PRAMOD BHOJRAJ

Respondent(s)

State of Maharastra Through Police Station Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application for release of the seized vehicle (TATA 1512 truck) to applicant Sameer Ahmad on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sundarbhai Desai that police stations are improper places for vehicle storage. However, the court imposed stringent conditions: the applicant must execute a ₹20 lakh indemnity bond, pay ₹200 per day per animal (for 20 cattle) to the Gaushala for their care from February 21, 2026 onwards, not sell or alter the vehicle, and produce it as directed. The vehicle was seized for transporting cattle without adequate food, water, or medical care, violating Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application for release of the seized vehicle (TATA 1512 truck) to applicant Sameer Ahmad on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sundarbhai Desai that police stations are improper places for vehicle storage. However, the court imposed stringent conditions: the applicant must execute a ₹20 lakh indemnity bond, pay ₹200 per day per animal (for 20 cattle) to the Gaushala for their care from February 21, 2026 onwards, not sell or alter the vehicle, and produce it as directed. The vehicle was seized for transporting cattle without adequate food, water, or medical care, violating Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case