Sameer Ahmad Shakil Ahmad Through Power of attorney holder Mishakant Alaam Mohmmad Maksud vs State of Maharastra Through Police Station Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat — 27/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG160003172026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
290/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
165
Police Station
Mouda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sameer Ahmad Shakil Ahmad Through Power of attorney holder Mishakant Alaam Mohmmad Maksud
Adv. SANGADIKAR PRAMOD BHOJRAJ
Respondent(s)
State of Maharastra Through Police Station Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the application for release of the seized vehicle (TATA 1512 truck) to applicant Sameer Ahmad on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sundarbhai Desai that police stations are improper places for vehicle storage. However, the court imposed stringent conditions: the applicant must execute a ₹20 lakh indemnity bond, pay ₹200 per day per animal (for 20 cattle) to the Gaushala for their care from February 21, 2026 onwards, not sell or alter the vehicle, and produce it as directed. The vehicle was seized for transporting cattle without adequate food, water, or medical care, violating Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the application for release of the seized vehicle (TATA 1512 truck) to applicant Sameer Ahmad on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sundarbhai Desai that police stations are improper places for vehicle storage. However, the court imposed stringent conditions: the applicant must execute a ₹20 lakh indemnity bond, pay ₹200 per day per animal (for 20 cattle) to the Gaushala for their care from February 21, 2026 onwards, not sell or alter the vehicle, and produce it as directed. The vehicle was seized for transporting cattle without adequate food, water, or medical care, violating Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts