State Maharashtra vs Arun Chandrabhan Bawanakule — 212/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG160003052026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
281/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
212/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
6-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
382
Police Station
Aroli
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arun Chandrabhan Bawanakule
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State Maharashtra v. Arun Chandrabhan Bawanakule (212/2026) The court convicted accused Arun Chandrabhan Bawanakule under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after he pleaded guilty. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. The case involved a special summons issued under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and the accused's guilty plea was transmitted through his pleader, leading to the conviction and sentencing order dated 14.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 212/2026
Case Summary: State Maharashtra v. Arun Chandrabhan Bawanakule (212/2026) The court convicted accused Arun Chandrabhan Bawanakule under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after he pleaded guilty. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. The case involved a special summons issued under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and the accused's guilty plea was transmitted through his pleader, leading to the conviction and sentencing order dated 14.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts