State Maharashtra vs Sandip Arun Khandekar and — 187/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG160002792026
Next Hearing
18th August 2026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
255/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
FIR Details
FIR Number
176
Police Station
Mouda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Maharashtra
Adv. B.M. Bhagat
Respondent(s)
Sandip Arun Khandekar and
Pranay Nashik Bagade
Ajay Bhimaro Hatvar
Prajval Khushal Khandekar
Adesh Dnyaneshwar Wasnik
Prit Sanjiv Walkar
Atul Uttam Ramteke
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 27-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 187/2026 In this summary criminal case, six accused were convicted of collecting money on gambling games under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The court accepted their guilty pleas and sentenced each to simple imprisonment till rising of court plus Rs. 300 fine (15 days SI in default). Bail bonds were surrendered, seized cash of Rs. 7,480 credited to government, and a mobile phone handed to accused. Proceedings remain pending for accused no. 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 187/2026 In this summary criminal case, six accused were convicted of collecting money on gambling games under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The court accepted their guilty pleas and sentenced each to simple imprisonment till rising of court plus Rs. 300 fine (15 days SI in default). Bail bonds were surrendered, seized cash of Rs. 7,480 credited to government, and a mobile phone handed to accused. Proceedings remain pending for accused no. 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts