Sheikh ysuf Abdul Jabbar vs State of Maharastra Through Police Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat — 25/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG160002722026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
248/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
25/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
173
Police Station
Mouda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sheikh ysuf Abdul Jabbar
Adv. SANGADIKAR PRAMOD BHOJRAJ
Respondent(s)
State of Maharastra Through Police Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
Disposed
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed Sheikh Yusuf's application to release his seized vehicle (Eicher PRO 2114XP) on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court's *Sundarbhai Desai* principle that police stations are improper places to store vehicles and magistrates can release them on suitable conditions. However, the applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 25 lakh and pay Rs. 200 per day per animal (33 animals) to the Gaushala (animal welfare organization) for past care, plus comply with conditions including producing the vehicle when directed and not altering its structure or transferring it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed Sheikh Yusuf's application to release his seized vehicle (Eicher PRO 2114XP) on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court's *Sundarbhai Desai* principle that police stations are improper places to store vehicles and magistrates can release them on suitable conditions. However, the applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 25 lakh and pay Rs. 200 per day per animal (33 animals) to the Gaushala (animal welfare organization) for past care, plus comply with conditions including producing the vehicle when directed and not altering its structure or transferring it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts