Sheikh ysuf Abdul Jabbar vs State of Maharastra Through Police Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat — 25/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG160002722026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

248/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

Mouda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Sheikh ysuf Abdul Jabbar

Adv. SANGADIKAR PRAMOD BHOJRAJ

Respondent(s)

State of Maharastra Through Police Mouda Advocate - B.M. Bhagat

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Hearing

02-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed Sheikh Yusuf's application to release his seized vehicle (Eicher PRO 2114XP) on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court's *Sundarbhai Desai* principle that police stations are improper places to store vehicles and magistrates can release them on suitable conditions. However, the applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 25 lakh and pay Rs. 200 per day per animal (33 animals) to the Gaushala (animal welfare organization) for past care, plus comply with conditions including producing the vehicle when directed and not altering its structure or transferring it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed Sheikh Yusuf's application to release his seized vehicle (Eicher PRO 2114XP) on supurtnama, citing the Supreme Court's *Sundarbhai Desai* principle that police stations are improper places to store vehicles and magistrates can release them on suitable conditions. However, the applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 25 lakh and pay Rs. 200 per day per animal (33 animals) to the Gaushala (animal welfare organization) for past care, plus comply with conditions including producing the vehicle when directed and not altering its structure or transferring it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case