State of Maharashtra vs Krushna Trambak Satpute and 2 Advocate - R.U.Dhone — 30/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG160002282017
Filing Number
217/2017
Filing Date
16-Mar-2017
Registration No
30/2017
Registration Date
16-Mar-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mouda
Judge
6-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
509
Police Station
Mouda
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krushna Trambak Satpute and 2 Advocate - R.U.Dhone
-
2.Sonu @ Chetan Dilip Chachne
-
3.Aman Ashok Gajbhiye
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Arguments
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
07-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
30-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c., Mouda
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence
-
27-May-2024
Evidence
-
12-Apr-2024
Evidence
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
-
23-Oct-2023
Evidence
-
02-Aug-2023
Evidence
-
15-Jun-2023
Evidence
-
04-May-2023
Evidence
-
21-Mar-2023
Evidence
-
23-Jan-2023
Evidence
-
23-Nov-2022
Evidence
-
15-Sep-2022
Evidence
-
19-Jul-2022
Evidence
-
23-May-2022
Evidence
-
04-Apr-2022
Evidence
-
11-Feb-2022
Evidence
-
23-Dec-2021
Evidence
-
27-Oct-2021
EvidenceView PDF
Summary The appeal is dismissed. The court upheld the conviction of Krishna Lakshman Gadkari (age 62) for copper theft from an Altarack Cement Company on October 19, 2016, where approximately 100 kg of copper wire and cable worth Rs. 80,000-85,000 was stolen. The court found the evidence, FIR (Section 10), and investigation (Section 11-12 CrPC) sufficient to support the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Oct-2021
Evidence
-
02-Sep-2021
Evidence
-
20-Jul-2021
Evidence
-
20-Apr-2021
Evidence
-
24-Feb-2021
Evidence
-
13-Jan-2021
Evidence
-
13-Oct-2020
Evidence
-
13-Jul-2020
Evidence
-
13-May-2020
Evidence
-
01-Apr-2020
Evidence
-
15-Feb-2020
Evidence
-
04-Jan-2020
Evidence
-
26-Nov-2019
Evidence
-
20-Sep-2019
ChargeView PDF
-
20-Sep-2019
Evidence
-
04-Jul-2019
Charge
-
05-Apr-2019
Charge
-
30-Jan-2019
Charge
-
02-Nov-2018
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
18-Aug-2018
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
14-May-2018
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
17-Mar-2018
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
21-Dec-2017
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
02-Nov-2017
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
28-Aug-2017
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
03-Jun-2017
Charge
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mouda
-
23-Mar-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2017
Summary The appeal is dismissed. The court upheld the conviction of Krishna Lakshman Gadkari (age 62) for copper theft from an Altarack Cement Company on October 19, 2016, where approximately 100 kg of copper wire and cable worth Rs. 80,000-85,000 was stolen. The court found the evidence, FIR (Section 10), and investigation (Section 11-12 CrPC) sufficient to support the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts