State Excise Department- Divisional 1 vs Nitin Walmik Kohale — 2060/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150029952024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2684/2024

Filing Date

21-11-2024

Registration No

2060/2024

Registration Date

21-11-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65 E

Petitioner(s)

State Excise Department- Divisional 1

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Nitin Walmik Kohale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna

10-03-2026

Disposed

16-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

26-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

25-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

27-06-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Nitin under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to file the required Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report to establish the nature of the seized article, making it impossible to proceed fairly. The court stopped proceedings due to prolonged pendency and ordered recall of the arrest warrant, with seized liquor to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal and any seized vehicle to be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Nitin under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to file the required Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report to establish the nature of the seized article, making it impossible to proceed fairly. The court stopped proceedings due to prolonged pendency and ordered recall of the arrest warrant, with seized liquor to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal and any seized vehicle to be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case