State Excise Department- Divisional 1 vs Nitin Walmik Kohale — 2060/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150029952024
Filing Number
2684/2024
Filing Date
21-Nov-2024
Registration No
2060/2024
Registration Date
21-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise Department- Divisional 1
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nitin Walmik Kohale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Nitin under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to file the required Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report to establish the nature of the seized article, making it impossible to proceed fairly. The court stopped proceedings due to prolonged pendency and ordered recall of the arrest warrant, with seized liquor to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal and any seized vehicle to be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
16-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
26-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
25-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
27-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
04-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
21-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
21-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2060/2024
The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Nitin under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to file the required Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report to establish the nature of the seized article, making it impossible to proceed fairly. The court stopped proceedings due to prolonged pendency and ordered recall of the arrest warrant, with seized liquor to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal and any seized vehicle to be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts