State Excise Department-Divisional 1 vs Varsha Dharmapal Pawar — 2059/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150029942024
Filing Number
2683/2024
Filing Date
21-Nov-2024
Registration No
2059/2024
Registration Date
21-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise Department-Divisional 1
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Varsha Dharmapal Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In State Vs. Varsha (SCC No. 2059/2024), the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna, discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the prosecution's failure to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, making it impossible to determine the nature of the seized article under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court stopped the proceedings, recalled the warrant, and ordered return of seized liquor to the Excise Department and any vehicle to its registered owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
16-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
26-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
25-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
27-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
04-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
21-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
21-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2059/2024
Summary: In State Vs. Varsha (SCC No. 2059/2024), the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna, discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the prosecution's failure to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, making it impossible to determine the nature of the seized article under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court stopped the proceedings, recalled the warrant, and ordered return of seized liquor to the Excise Department and any vehicle to its registered owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts