State Excise Department-Divisional 1 vs Dharmapal Arjun Gajbhiye — 2057/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150029922024
Filing Number
2681/2024
Filing Date
21-Nov-2024
Registration No
2057/2024
Registration Date
21-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise Department-Divisional 1
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dharmapal Arjun Gajbhiye
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings and discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, making it impossible to determine whether the seized article was alcoholic or non-alcoholic. The court recalled the warrant, and ordered seized liquor be sent to the Excise Department for disposal and any seized vehicle be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
16-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
26-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
25-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
27-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
04-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
21-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
21-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2057/2024
The court stopped proceedings and discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, making it impossible to determine whether the seized article was alcoholic or non-alcoholic. The court recalled the warrant, and ordered seized liquor be sent to the Excise Department for disposal and any seized vehicle be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts